High-profile lawyers and MPs come together tonight for a People’s Parliament debate on “the Demise of Justice“, including Michael Mansfield QC.
We’re liveblogging the eventhere from 6.30-8.30pm, picking out the best of the speeches, pictures, context and reaction on Twitter.
Follow us via @legal_aid_watch for live tweets, and follow the rest of the action via #peoplesparliament or @pplsparliament.
20.47PM: Well, the audience are on their way home and that’s it from us – for the moment. Check in with us again soon for more comment and analysis following tonight’s debate!
20.40PM: The debate is rounding up, with several voices appealing for the media to do more to cover the issue of legal aid. Liz Davis meanwhile has asked the audience to “go home, google the petition for legal aid justice and sign it!”
With just two weeks to go before the second historic strike by barristers across England and Wales, Mr Nigel Lithman QC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, speaks to Legal Aid Watch about his hopes for the next course of action. We ask him about some barristers’ concerns that the campaign has focused too heavily on professionals’ salaries and whether the campaign is managing to capture the public’s attention.
Central Criminal Court
We’ve already had one strike in January and we have the second round of walk outs in two weeks. What are you hoping this second action will achieve?
What we’ve done is to take incremental steps to try and illustrate to the government that it is fairly straight forward to have real impact on the running of the courts and that in order for a profession as conservative as the bar to take this action, things must be wholly desperate. We want to illustrate that the bar is just not prepared to operate at the rates that will be on offer after the cuts.
For a profession as conservative as the bar to take this action, things must be wholly desperate
To what extent to you think your campaign has been successful in engaging the public with the problems caused by cuts to legal aid? Continue reading →
Meanwhile, in the first of two news stories featuring the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), top UK barrister and CBA Chairman has warned that legal aid cuts could lead to murderers and rapists walking free.
“Without wishing to alarm the public, the impact of cuts will mean more cases collapse with murderers, rapists and child-sex offenders walking free.”
In an interview with the Mirror on November 17, Nigel Lithman QC said that “top lawyers would refuse to take on long, serious cases as they would not be paid enough.”
According to the Mirror, he said hourly rates would dip below the minimum wage and commercial barristers would earn in an hour what criminal barristers earn in a fortnight.
“The criminal justice system is being turned into a wasteland.”
What do you think? What constitutes a fair salary for legal aid lawyers? Tweet us your views, take our poll and add your comments below.
Poster from the CBA (Credit: Criminal Bar Association)
According to Legal Voice UK, the vote took place at the CBA’s national delegates’ conference in London on November 17. The government’s proposals for legal aid include a further 17.5% cut to defence barristers’ feesin criminal legal aid cases.
Mark George QC has been quoted as saying:
“I appreciate for some of you, this may sound radical. It is radical. We are in a radical situation. It’s time to fix the bayonets because we are not going to go down without a fight.”
However, CBA Chairman Nigel Lithman QC urged for “caution” as a number of barristers at the conference reportedly asked for a strike date.
Similarly, Clifford Chance announced on November 15 that it will take steps to fund free legal advice. The global firm will give £73,000 to three legal advice centres to help them continue to support vulnerable communities in the face of public funding cuts.
In his first press briefing since taking the office of Lord Chief Justice in October, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd said he was “not persuaded” that legal aid cuts have so far affected access to justice. He voiced his concerns, however, that the judiciary might suffer from legal aid cuts in the future as talented individuals are discouraged from entering the profession. “The level of remuneration that has to be paid to those who are doing publicly funded work must be commensurate with an amount that will attract people into it,” he said.
These concerns were echoed in a letter from senior QCs to The Independent.
Justice Secretary Chris Grayling
The letter, signed by the leaders of the Bar Council’s six circuits in England and Wales, criticised Justice Secretary Chris Grayling’s plans to cut legal aid fees for criminal cases, saying they will cause “irreparable harm” to the legal system because lawyers will exit the profession and “find something else to do”.
At the Bar’s annual conference on Saturday, Dominic Grieve, the Attorney General, warned barristers against turning down new legal aid briefs as a form of protest against cuts. “The disruption caused to the courts may bring about the changes you desire, but equally it also carries with it the very serious risk that within government there will simply be a view that people should look elsewhere for the services we [barristers] provided” he said.
Attorney General Dominic Grieve
On Monday, however, the Criminal Bar Association reported that barristers are refusing to act in 40 very high cost criminal cases in a protest over cuts to legal aid fees. Solicitors have also called for a special meeting of the Law Society, urging a vote of no-confidence in the leadership’s “appeasement and abject surrender” to government legal aid cuts.
Finally, a new Law Societyreport finds that a record number of newly qualified solicitors are undertaking pro bono work. Almost half of all assistant and associate solicitors are providing pro bono services in 2013, up 10% on the previous year.